Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWADX vs RGACX
NWADX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NWADX vs RGACX
NWADX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWADX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWADX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. NWADX (217M). NWADX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWADX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NWADX (8 years) vs RGACX (24 years). NWADX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NWADX (11.29). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWADX: RGACX (250) vs NWADX (50000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.84 vs. NWADX (-6.18). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 14.53 vs. NWADX (3.94).
| NWADX | RGACX | NWADX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.93 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.93 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.602 | 8.986 | 7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 250 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 217M | 342B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.18 | 3.84 | -161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.51 | 45.92 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.94 | 14.53 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.61 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement