Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWADX vs RGAGX
NWADX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NWADX vs RGAGX
NWADX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWADX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWADX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. NWADX (215M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NWADX: RGAGX (0.51) vs NWADX (0.00). NWADX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NWADX (8 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). NWADX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NWADX (11.29). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWADX: RGAGX (250) vs NWADX (50000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.74 vs. NWADX (-1.75). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 23.74 vs. NWADX (6.81).
| NWADX | RGAGX | NWADX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.29 | 317% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.29 | 352% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.556 | 9.458 | -16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 250 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 215M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.75 | 12.74 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.27 | 47.47 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.81 | 23.74 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 117.20 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers