Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWADX vs RGAHX
NWADX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts NWADX vs RGAHX
NWADX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWADX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWADX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. NWADX (209M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than NWADX: RGAHX (0.40) vs NWADX (0.00). NWADX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: NWADX (8 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). NWADX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NWADX (11.29). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWADX: RGAHX (250) vs NWADX (50000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.18 vs. NWADX (-10.88). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.78 vs. NWADX (2.22).
| NWADX | RGAHX | NWADX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.44 | 209% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.44 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.452 | 9.200 | -5% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 250 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 209M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.88 | 0.18 | -6,057% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.44 | 43.47 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.22 | 13.78 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 106.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement