Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWALX vs RWEBX
NWALX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts NWALX vs RWEBX
NWALX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWALX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWALX is a StrongBuy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. NWALX (951M). NWALX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: NWALX (1.21) vs RWEBX (0.76). NWALX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: NWALX (7 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). NWALX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NWALX (8.73). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWALX: RWEBX (250) vs NWALX (2000). NWALX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.42 vs. RWEBX (4.77). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.10 vs. NWALX (9.96).
| NWALX | RWEBX | NWALX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.06 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.06 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.945 | 3.701 | 404% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 951M | 219B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.76 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.42 | 4.77 | 302% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.90 | 27.94 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.96 | 24.10 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 72.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement