Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWALX vs RWEBX
NWALX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts NWALX vs RWEBX
NWALX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWALX vs. RWEBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWALX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NWALX (951M). NWALX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: NWALX (1.16) vs RWEBX (0.74). NWALX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: NWALX (7 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). NWALX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NWALX (8.73). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWALX: RWEBX (250) vs NWALX (2000). NWALX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.41 vs. RWEBX (1.26). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 23.43 vs. NWALX (10.36).
| NWALX | RWEBX | NWALX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.06 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.06 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.081 | 3.934 | 434% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 951M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.74 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.41 | 1.26 | 1,062% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.67 | 27.16 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.36 | 23.43 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 75.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement