Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWAMX vs RMEBX
NWAMX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NWAMX vs RMEBX
NWAMX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWAMX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWAMX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. NWAMX (920M). NWAMX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: NWAMX (1.42) vs RMEBX (1.04). NWAMX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NWAMX (39 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than NWAMX (0.79). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NWAMX (8.73). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWAMX: RMEBX (250) vs NWAMX (2500). NWAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.51 vs. RMEBX (9.11). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.74 vs. NWAMX (10.46).
| NWAMX | RMEBX | NWAMX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.07 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.636 | 6.308 | 216% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 920M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.04 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.51 | 9.11 | 203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.70 | 34.37 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.46 | 34.74 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.69 | 94.33 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement