Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWANX vs RWEBX
NWANX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts NWANX vs RWEBX
NWANX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWANX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWANX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NWANX (924M). NWANX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: NWANX (1.50) vs RWEBX (0.75). NWANX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: NWANX (7 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than NWANX (0.69). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NWANX (8.73). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWANX: RWEBX (250) vs NWANX (1000000). NWANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.25 vs. RWEBX (8.08). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 26.60 vs. NWANX (13.68).
| NWANX | RWEBX | NWANX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.06 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.06 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.933 | 2.150 | 601% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 924M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 0.75 | 199% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.25 | 8.08 | 226% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.74 | 26.43 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.68 | 26.60 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 75.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement