Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWAVX vs RGEBX
NWAVX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NWAVX vs RGEBX
NWAVX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. NWAVX (398M). NWAVX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: NWAVX (2.65) vs RGEBX (0.00). NWAVX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NWAVX (5 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than NWAVX (0.58). NWAVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.65 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWAVX: RGEBX (250) vs NWAVX (1000000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.18 vs. NWAVX (1.39). NWAVX return over 5 years is better than : 35.18 vs. RGEBX (12.32).
| NWAVX | RGEBX | NWAVX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.08 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.08 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.922 | 6.522 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 398M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.39 | 5.18 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.58 | 41.43 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.18 | 12.32 | 285% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 105.28 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement