Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWAWX vs RGAHX
NWAWX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts NWAWX vs RGAHX
NWAWX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. NWAWX (386M). NWAWX pays higher dividends than RGAHX: NWAWX (2.52) vs RGAHX (0.39). NWAWX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: NWAWX (5 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). NWAWX (0.83) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). NWAWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.65 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWAWX: RGAHX (250) vs NWAWX (50000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. NWAWX (-0.75). NWAWX return over 5 years is better than : 34.19 vs. RGAHX (16.22).
| NWAWX | RGAHX | NWAWX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.44 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.44 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.847 | 6.424 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 250 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 386M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.52 | 0.39 | 639% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.75 | 8.70 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.92 | 45.89 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.19 | 16.22 | 211% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 113.43 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement