Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWAWX vs RGEBX
NWAWX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NWAWX vs RGEBX
NWAWX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. NWAWX (398M). NWAWX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: NWAWX (2.63) vs RGEBX (0.00). NWAWX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NWAWX (5 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than NWAWX (0.83). NWAWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.65 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWAWX: RGEBX (250) vs NWAWX (50000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.42 vs. NWAWX (2.37). NWAWX return over 5 years is better than : 34.63 vs. RGEBX (12.32).
| NWAWX | RGEBX | NWAWX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.08 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.08 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.787 | 6.888 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 250 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 398M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.37 | 3.42 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.48 | 36.26 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.63 | 12.32 | 281% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement