Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCAX vs RGAAX
NWCAX vs RGAAX Comparison
Open Charts NWCAX vs RGAAX
NWCAX vs RGAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCAX vs. RGAAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCAX is a Buy and RGAAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAAX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. NWCAX (918M). NWCAX (0.00) and RGAAX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWCAX was incepted earlier than RGAAX: NWCAX (17 years) vs RGAAX (24 years). RGAAX (1.37) is less costly to investors than NWCAX (1.03). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. RGAAX (32.00). RGAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: RGAAX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). RGAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.14 vs. NWCAX (-14.56). RGAAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.72 vs. NWCAX (-15.68).
| NWCAX | RGAAX | NWCAX / RGAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.37 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.37 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.554 | 8.490 | 54% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 918M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.56 | -2.14 | 680% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.83 | 35.28 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.68 | 4.72 | -332% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.66 | 84.80 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers