Ad is loading...
NWCAX vs RGAGX
NWCAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NWCAX vs RGAGX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$52.85
Change+$0.33 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets831.3M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$72.82
Change+$0.54 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
NWCAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCAX vs. RGAGX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCAX is a Buy and RGAGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. NWCAX (831M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NWCAX: RGAGX (0.70) vs NWCAX (0.00). NWCAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NWCAX (16 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). NWCAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: RGAGX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.03 vs. NWCAX (-6.03). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 46.25 vs. NWCAX (30.03).
| NWCAX | RGAGX | NWCAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.30 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.30 | 360% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.030 | -2.321 | 260% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 831M | 284B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.70 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.03 | 4.03 | -150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.82 | 35.22 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.03 | 46.25 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.97 | 63.82 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers