Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCAX vs RGAGX
NWCAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NWCAX vs RGAGX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$62.93
Change-$0.46 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets882.64M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$88.92
Change-$0.58 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
NWCAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCAX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. NWCAX (883M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NWCAX: RGAGX (0.58) vs NWCAX (0.00). NWCAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NWCAX (16 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). NWCAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: RGAGX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.55 vs. NWCAX (4.79). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 44.77 vs. NWCAX (26.81).
| NWCAX | RGAGX | NWCAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.30 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.30 | 360% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.419 | 19.276 | 70% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 883M | 343B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.58 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.79 | 15.55 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.12 | 76.14 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.81 | 44.77 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.12 | 106.84 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement