Ad is loading...
NWCAX vs RGAGX
NWCAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NWCAX vs RGAGX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$48.20
Change-$3.02 (-5.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets818.98M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$67.01
Change-$3.99 (-5.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
NWCAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCAX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. NWCAX (819M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NWCAX: RGAGX (0.71) vs NWCAX (0.00). NWCAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NWCAX (16 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). NWCAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: RGAGX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.57 vs. NWCAX (-8.91). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 73.43 vs. NWCAX (56.59).
| NWCAX | RGAGX | NWCAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.30 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.30 | 360% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.356 | -4.762 | 175% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 819M | 280B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.71 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.91 | 0.57 | -1,554% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.76 | 6.06 | -29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.59 | 73.43 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.51 | 62.93 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...