Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCAX vs RGAGX
NWCAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NWCAX vs RGAGX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$61.91
Change+$0.45 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets846.49M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$86.57
Change+$0.46 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
NWCAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCAX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. NWCAX (846M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NWCAX: RGAGX (0.56) vs NWCAX (0.00). NWCAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NWCAX (17 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). NWCAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: RGAGX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.34 vs. NWCAX (-4.43). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 35.91 vs. NWCAX (21.06).
| NWCAX | RGAGX | NWCAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.30 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.30 | 360% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.966 | 16.123 | 62% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 846M | 327B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.56 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.43 | 7.34 | -60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.26 | 64.06 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.06 | 35.91 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.47 | 92.33 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement