Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCAX vs RGAGX
NWCAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NWCAX vs RGAGX
NWCAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCAX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. NWCAX (966M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NWCAX: RGAGX (0.51) vs NWCAX (0.00). NWCAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NWCAX (17 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). NWCAX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: RGAGX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.75 vs. NWCAX (-8.65). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 17.74 vs. NWCAX (-8.76).
| NWCAX | RGAGX | NWCAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.29 | 310% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.29 | 355% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.153 | 7.335 | 111% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 966M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.65 | 4.75 | -182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.45 | 41.00 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.76 | 17.74 | -49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.42 | 106.44 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement