Ad is loading...
NWCCX vs RGAEX
NWCCX vs RGAEX Comparison
Open Charts NWCCX vs RGAEX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG C
Price$35.12
Change+$0.63 (+1.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets760.07M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R4
Price$66.32
Change+$1.04 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.04B
NWCCX vs RGAEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCCX vs. RGAEX commentary
Apr 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCCX is a Buy and RGAEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAEX has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. NWCCX (760M). RGAEX pays higher dividends than NWCCX: RGAEX (0.37) vs NWCCX (0.00). NWCCX was incepted earlier than RGAEX: NWCCX (16 years) vs RGAEX (23 years). NWCCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RGAEX (0.64). NWCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAEX (25.00). RGAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCCX: RGAEX (250) vs NWCCX (2500). RGAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.32 vs. NWCCX (-18.95). RGAEX return over 5 years is better than : 47.11 vs. NWCCX (14.58).
| NWCCX | RGAEX | NWCCX / RGAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.64 | 258% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.64 | 286% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.241 | -9.793 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 760M | 265B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.37 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.95 | -5.32 | 356% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.32 | 6.79 | -137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.58 | 47.11 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.38 | 50.15 | -37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers