Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCCX vs RGAEX
NWCCX vs RGAEX Comparison
Open Charts NWCCX vs RGAEX
NWCCX vs RGAEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCCX vs. RGAEX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCCX is a Buy and RGAEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAEX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. NWCCX (1B). RGAEX pays higher dividends than NWCCX: RGAEX (0.21) vs NWCCX (0.00). NWCCX was incepted earlier than RGAEX: NWCCX (17 years) vs RGAEX (24 years). NWCCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than RGAEX (0.63). NWCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. RGAEX (32.00). RGAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCCX: RGAEX (250) vs NWCCX (2500). RGAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.00 vs. NWCCX (-14.82). RGAEX return over 5 years is better than : 18.86 vs. NWCCX (-25.80).
| NWCCX | RGAEX | NWCCX / RGAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.63 | 262% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.63 | 283% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.362 | 8.698 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1B | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.82 | 12.00 | -124% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.74 | 48.29 | -2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.80 | 18.86 | -137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.84 | 117.44 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement