Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCCX vs RGAFX
NWCCX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts NWCCX vs RGAFX
NWCCX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCCX vs. RGAFX commentary
Aug 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCCX is a Buy and RGAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. NWCCX (963M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than NWCCX: RGAFX (0.48) vs NWCCX (0.00). NWCCX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: NWCCX (17 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). NWCCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). NWCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. RGAFX (32.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCCX: RGAFX (250) vs NWCCX (2500). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.27 vs. NWCCX (-19.53). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.40 vs. NWCCX (-30.50).
| NWCCX | RGAFX | NWCCX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.34 | 485% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.34 | 524% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.945 | 10.196 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 963M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.53 | 6.27 | -312% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.76 | 45.20 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.50 | 18.40 | -166% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.66 | 107.68 | -6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers