Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCCX vs VIGRX
NWCCX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts NWCCX vs VIGRX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG C
Price$44.18
Change+$0.51 (+1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets875.06M
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$238.90
Change+$1.50 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.3B
NWCCX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCCX vs. VIGRX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCCX is a Buy and VIGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 324B vs. NWCCX (875M). VIGRX pays higher dividends than NWCCX: VIGRX (0.32) vs NWCCX (0.00). NWCCX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: NWCCX (16 years) vs VIGRX (33 years). NWCCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). NWCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. VIGRX (11.00). NWCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIGRX: NWCCX (2500) vs VIGRX (3000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.73 vs. NWCCX (-3.75). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 93.62 vs. NWCCX (0.16).
| NWCCX | VIGRX | NWCCX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.17 | 971% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.17 | 1,076% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.880 | 12.357 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 875M | 324B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.32 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.75 | 23.73 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.59 | 89.33 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.16 | 93.62 | 0% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.45 | 347.04 | 1% |