Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCFX vs RGAAX
NWCFX vs RGAAX Comparison
Open Charts NWCFX vs RGAAX
NWCFX vs RGAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCFX vs. RGAAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCFX is a Buy and RGAAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAAX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. NWCFX (918M). NWCFX (0.00) and RGAAX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWCFX was incepted earlier than RGAAX: NWCFX (13 years) vs RGAAX (24 years). RGAAX (1.37) is less costly to investors than NWCFX (0.67). NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. RGAAX (32.00). RGAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: RGAAX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). RGAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.14 vs. NWCFX (-11.91). RGAAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.72 vs. NWCFX (-8.82).
| NWCFX | RGAAX | NWCFX / RGAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.37 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.37 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.784 | 8.490 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 918M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.91 | -2.14 | 556% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.46 | 35.28 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.82 | 4.72 | -187% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.45 | 84.80 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers