Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCFX vs RGACX
NWCFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NWCFX vs RGACX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$63.91
Change-$0.14 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets890.32M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$75.11
Change-$0.25 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.87B
NWCFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCFX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCFX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 305B vs. NWCFX (890M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: RGACX (0.08) vs NWCFX (0.00). NWCFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NWCFX (12 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than NWCFX (0.69). NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: RGACX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.05 vs. NWCFX (-0.36). RGACX (41.96) and NWCFX (40.55) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NWCFX | RGACX | NWCFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.94 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.94 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.284 | 4.681 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 890M | 305B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.36 | 8.05 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.96 | 36.40 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.55 | 41.96 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.66 | 70.88 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers