Ad is loading...
NWCFX vs RGACX
NWCFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NWCFX vs RGACX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$63.74
Change+$0.67 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets938.25M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$74.41
Change+$0.84 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.54B
NWCFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCFX vs. RGACX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCFX is a Hold and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 307B vs. NWCFX (938M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: RGACX (0.25) vs NWCFX (0.00). NWCFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NWCFX (12 years) vs RGACX (23 years). NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGACX (31.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: RGACX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.64 vs. NWCFX (13.62). NWCFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.16 vs. RGACX (43.54).
| NWCFX | RGACX | NWCFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.789 | 3.362 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 938M | 307B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.25 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.62 | 21.64 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.02 | 11.55 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.16 | 43.54 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.08 | 80.52 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...