Ad is loading...
NWCFX vs RGACX
NWCFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NWCFX vs RGACX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$64.89
Change-$0.40 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$72.40
Change-$9.37 (-11.46%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
NWCFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCFX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCFX is a Hold and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 315B vs. NWCFX (911M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: RGACX (0.25) vs NWCFX (0.00). NWCFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NWCFX (12 years) vs RGACX (23 years). NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGACX (31.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: RGACX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.84 vs. NWCFX (18.85). NWCFX return over 5 years is better than : 57.44 vs. RGACX (53.77).
| NWCFX | RGACX | NWCFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.412 | 33.524 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 911M | 315B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.25 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.85 | 34.84 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.77 | 17.52 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.44 | 53.77 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.48 | 93.96 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...