Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCFX vs RGACX
NWCFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NWCFX vs RGACX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$69.69
Change-$0.22 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets869.01M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.25
Change+$0.06 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
NWCFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCFX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCFX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. NWCFX (869M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: RGACX (0.07) vs NWCFX (0.00). NWCFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NWCFX (12 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than NWCFX (0.69). NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: RGACX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.97 vs. NWCFX (5.70). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 46.16 vs. NWCFX (37.32).
| NWCFX | RGACX | NWCFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.94 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.94 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.642 | 18.419 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 869M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.70 | 16.97 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.90 | 61.65 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.32 | 46.16 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.82 | 100.90 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement