Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCFX vs RGACX
NWCFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NWCFX vs RGACX
NWCFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCFX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCFX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. NWCFX (1.03B). NWCFX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWCFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NWCFX (13 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than NWCFX (0.67). NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: RGACX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.40 vs. NWCFX (0.46). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 20.76 vs. NWCFX (11.34).
| NWCFX | RGACX | NWCFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.93 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.93 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.327 | 9.929 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.03B | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.46 | 13.40 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.89 | 50.58 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.34 | 20.76 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.84 | 107.11 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers