Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWFAX vs RWEBX
NWFAX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts NWFAX vs RWEBX
NWFAX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWFAX vs. RWEBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWFAX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NWFAX (1.73B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than NWFAX: RWEBX (0.74) vs NWFAX (0.24). NWFAX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: NWFAX (28 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than NWFAX (0.92). NWFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.38 vs. RWEBX (32.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWFAX: RWEBX (250) vs NWFAX (2000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.26 vs. NWFAX (-12.85). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 23.43 vs. NWFAX (-6.07).
| NWFAX | RWEBX | NWFAX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.06 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.06 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.571 | 3.934 | 167% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.73B | 218B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.74 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.85 | 1.26 | -1,018% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.96 | 27.16 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.07 | 23.43 | -26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.13 | 75.35 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers