Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWFAX vs RWMFX
NWFAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NWFAX vs RWMFX
NWFAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWFAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWFAX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. NWFAX (1.54B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NWFAX: RWMFX (1.40) vs NWFAX (0.27). NWFAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NWFAX (28 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). NWFAX (0.92) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). NWFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.38 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWFAX: RWMFX (250) vs NWFAX (2000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.10 vs. NWFAX (-4.38). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.71 vs. NWFAX (0.15).
| NWFAX | RWMFX | NWFAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.31 | 284% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.31 | 297% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.508 | 5.575 | 117% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.54B | 214B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 1.40 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.38 | 8.10 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.21 | 33.11 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.15 | 26.71 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.95 | 85.42 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement