Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHFX vs SSGSX
NWHFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NWHFX vs SSGSX
Nationwide Bailard Cogntv Val M
Price$16.35
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.02M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
NWHFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHFX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. NWHFX (110M). NWHFX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NWHFX (1.54) vs SSGSX (0.47). NWHFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NWHFX (24 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NWHFX (0.93). NWHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 278.84 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHFX: SSGSX (2500) vs NWHFX (5000). NWHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.56 vs. SSGSX (-1.56). NWHFX return over 5 years is better than : 70.01 vs. SSGSX (22.95).
| NWHFX | SSGSX | NWHFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.723 | 2.046 | 329% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110M | 5.64B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 0.47 | 326% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.56 | -1.56 | -36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.40 | 3.97 | 539% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.01 | 22.95 | 305% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.02 | 24.71 | 211% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers