Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHFX vs SSGSX
NWHFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NWHFX vs SSGSX
Nationwide Bailard Cogntv Val M
Price$14.45
Change-$0.27 (-1.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.61M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$42.53
Change-$0.78 (-1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.52B
NWHFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHFX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.52B vs. NWHFX (97.6M). NWHFX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NWHFX (1.85) vs SSGSX (0.52). NWHFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NWHFX (24 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NWHFX (0.93). NWHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 278.84 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHFX: SSGSX (2500) vs NWHFX (5000). NWHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.01 vs. SSGSX (-8.36). NWHFX return over 5 years is better than : 64.68 vs. SSGSX (21.72).
| NWHFX | SSGSX | NWHFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.679 | -8.400 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.6M | 5.52B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.85 | 0.52 | 353% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.01 | -8.36 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.22 | -3.90 | -211% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.68 | 21.72 | 298% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.49 | 7.10 | 359% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers