Ad is loading...
NWHFX vs SSGSX
NWHFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NWHFX vs SSGSX
Nationwide Bailard Cogntv Val M
Price$13.65
Change+$0.16 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.85M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$40.06
Change+$0.33 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.29B
NWHFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHFX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.29B vs. NWHFX (90.8M). NWHFX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NWHFX (1.91) vs SSGSX (0.52). NWHFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NWHFX (24 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NWHFX (0.93). NWHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 278.84 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHFX: SSGSX (2500) vs NWHFX (5000). NWHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.70 vs. SSGSX (-15.28). NWHFX return over 5 years is better than : 75.56 vs. SSGSX (22.94).
| NWHFX | SSGSX | NWHFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.945 | -14.430 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.8M | 5.29B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 0.52 | 370% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.70 | -15.28 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.55 | -16.96 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.56 | 22.94 | 329% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.12 | 1.36 | 1,185% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers