Ad is loading...
NWHFX vs SSGSX
NWHFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NWHFX vs SSGSX
Nationwide Bailard Cogntv Val M
Price$14.45
Change+$0.17 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.47M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$43.60
Change+$0.57 (+1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.8B
NWHFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHFX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.8B vs. NWHFX (96.5M). NWHFX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NWHFX (1.91) vs SSGSX (0.52). NWHFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NWHFX (24 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NWHFX (0.93). NWHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 278.84 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHFX: SSGSX (2500) vs NWHFX (5000). NWHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.76 vs. SSGSX (-10.13). NWHFX return over 5 years is better than : 110.78 vs. SSGSX (49.15).
| NWHFX | SSGSX | NWHFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.789 | -7.323 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 96.5M | 5.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 0.52 | 370% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.76 | -10.13 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.01 | -12.11 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 110.78 | 49.15 | 225% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.25 | 9.81 | 217% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers