Ad is loading...
NWHFX vs SSGSX
NWHFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NWHFX vs SSGSX
Nationwide Bailard Cogntv Val M
Price$15.59
Change+$0.08 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.16M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.63
Change+$0.07 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.68B
NWHFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHFX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 6.68B vs. NWHFX (105M). NWHFX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NWHFX (1.64) vs SSGSX (0.35). NWHFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NWHFX (24 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). NWHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 257.75 vs. SSGSX (32.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHFX: SSGSX (2500) vs NWHFX (5000). NWHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.70 vs. SSGSX (5.32). NWHFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.26 vs. SSGSX (6.54).
| NWHFX | SSGSX | NWHFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.762 | 2.585 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 105M | 6.68B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 0.35 | 461% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.70 | 5.32 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.56 | -5.92 | -9% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.26 | 6.54 | 570% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.72 | 30.62 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...