Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHFX vs SSGSX
NWHFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NWHFX vs SSGSX
NWHFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHFX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 4.1B vs. NWHFX (129M). NWHFX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NWHFX (1.19) vs SSGSX (0.52). NWHFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NWHFX (25 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than NWHFX (0.80). NWHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 404.58 vs. SSGSX (50.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHFX: SSGSX (2500) vs NWHFX (5000). NWHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.01 vs. SSGSX (8.91). NWHFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.16 vs. SSGSX (-2.55).
| NWHFX | SSGSX | NWHFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.23 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.23 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.327 | 15.641 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 129M | 4.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 0.52 | 229% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.01 | 8.91 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.35 | 12.96 | 265% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.16 | -2.55 | -791% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.77 | 35.89 | 161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement