Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHZX vs WCMLX
NWHZX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NWHZX vs WCMLX
NWHZX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHZX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHZX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NWHZX has more cash in the bank: 755M vs. WCMLX (47.2M). NWHZX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWHZX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NWHZX (17 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NWHZX (1.19). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. NWHZX (27.09). NWHZX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NWHZX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.81 vs. NWHZX (-6.91). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.51 vs. NWHZX (-20.83).
| NWHZX | WCMLX | NWHZX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.99 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.79 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.061 | 3.852 | -28% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 755M | 47.2M | 1,600% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.91 | 2.81 | -246% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.18 | 23.40 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.83 | -7.51 | 277% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement