Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHZX vs WCMLX
NWHZX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NWHZX vs WCMLX
NWHZX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHZX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHZX is a StrongBuy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NWHZX has more cash in the bank: 906M vs. WCMLX (54.2M). NWHZX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWHZX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NWHZX (17 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NWHZX (1.19). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. NWHZX (27.09). NWHZX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NWHZX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.61 vs. NWHZX (-0.39). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 3.79 vs. NWHZX (-13.87).
| NWHZX | WCMLX | NWHZX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.99 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.79 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.360 | 13.517 | 40% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 906M | 54.2M | 1,672% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.39 | 22.61 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.11 | 28.03 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.87 | 3.79 | -366% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.92 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers