Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHZX vs WCMLX
NWHZX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NWHZX vs WCMLX
NWHZX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHZX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHZX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NWHZX has more cash in the bank: 967M vs. WCMLX (55.2M). NWHZX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWHZX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NWHZX (17 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NWHZX (1.19). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. NWHZX (27.09). NWHZX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NWHZX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.66 vs. NWHZX (0.79). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.32 vs. NWHZX (-14.71).
| NWHZX | WCMLX | NWHZX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.99 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.79 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.340 | 13.735 | 32% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 967M | 55.2M | 1,752% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.79 | 29.66 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.29 | 36.68 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.71 | -0.32 | 4,619% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers