Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWJCX vs RGAHX
NWJCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts NWJCX vs RGAHX
NWJCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWJCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWJCX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. NWJCX (824M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than NWJCX: RGAHX (0.39) vs NWJCX (0.27). NWJCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: NWJCX (30 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). NWJCX (0.64) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NWJCX (0.31). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWJCX: RGAHX (250) vs NWJCX (2000). NWJCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.06 vs. RGAHX (8.63). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 18.83 vs. NWJCX (10.50).
| NWJCX | RGAHX | NWJCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.44 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.44 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.023 | 6.676 | 375% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 824M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 0.39 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.06 | 8.63 | 418% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.18 | 45.32 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.50 | 18.83 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 175.88 | 109.21 | 161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement