Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWJCX vs RGEBX
NWJCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NWJCX vs RGEBX
NWJCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWJCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWJCX is a Hold and RGEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. NWJCX (795M). NWJCX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: NWJCX (0.24) vs RGEBX (0.00). NWJCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NWJCX (30 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than NWJCX (0.64). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NWJCX (0.31). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWJCX: RGEBX (250) vs NWJCX (2000). NWJCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.94 vs. RGEBX (-1.37). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.25 vs. NWJCX (3.35).
| NWJCX | RGEBX | NWJCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.08 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.08 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.528 | 3.522 | 583% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 795M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.94 | -1.37 | -1,971% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.59 | 31.56 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.35 | 7.25 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 148.41 | 87.68 | 169% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers