Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWJFX vs RGAHX
NWJFX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts NWJFX vs RGAHX
NWJFX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWJFX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWJFX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. NWJFX (813M). NWJFX pays higher dividends than RGAHX: NWJFX (0.42) vs RGAHX (0.40). NWJFX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: NWJFX (17 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). RGAHX (0.44) and NWJFX (0.43) have similar cost to investors . RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NWJFX (0.31). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWJFX: RGAHX (250) vs NWJFX (50000). NWJFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.96 vs. RGAHX (0.18). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.78 vs. NWJFX (6.22).
| NWJFX | RGAHX | NWJFX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.44 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.44 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.191 | 9.200 | 252% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 250 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 813M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.40 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.96 | 0.18 | 13,902% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.95 | 43.47 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.22 | 13.78 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 162.41 | 106.68 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement