Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWJFX vs RGEBX
NWJFX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NWJFX vs RGEBX
NWJFX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWJFX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWJFX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. NWJFX (829M). NWJFX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: NWJFX (0.41) vs RGEBX (0.00). NWJFX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NWJFX (17 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than NWJFX (0.43). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NWJFX (0.31). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWJFX: RGEBX (250) vs NWJFX (50000). NWJFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.65 vs. RGEBX (3.42). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 12.32 vs. NWJFX (11.21).
| NWJFX | RGEBX | NWJFX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 1.08 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 1.08 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.062 | 6.888 | 378% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 250 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 829M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.65 | 3.42 | 1,013% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.67 | 36.26 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.21 | 12.32 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 173.84 | 93.96 | 185% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement