It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NWPX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NWPX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RCMT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
NWPX (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а +5.71% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was +4.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.58%.
NWPX is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2025.
The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.
NWPX | RCMT | NWPX / RCMT | |
Capitalization | 558M | 170M | 328% |
EBITDA | 64.9M | 24.8M | 262% |
Gain YTD | 86.021 | -25.895 | -332% |
P/E Ratio | 19.15 | 10.56 | 181% |
Revenue | 483M | 263M | 184% |
Total Cash | 5.72M | 6.28M | 91% |
Total Debt | 158M | 34M | 465% |
NWPX | RCMT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 92 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 32 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 75 | 17 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NWPX's Valuation (88) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as RCMT (88) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that NWPX’s stock grew similarly to RCMT’s over the last 12 months.
NWPX's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as RCMT (32) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that NWPX’s stock grew similarly to RCMT’s over the last 12 months.
RCMT's SMR Rating (17) in the Personnel Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NWPX (75) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that RCMT’s stock grew somewhat faster than NWPX’s over the last 12 months.
NWPX's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as RCMT (53) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that NWPX’s stock grew similarly to RCMT’s over the last 12 months.
NWPX's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Metal Fabrication industry is significantly better than the same rating for RCMT (86) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that NWPX’s stock grew significantly faster than RCMT’s over the last 12 months.
NWPX | RCMT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago71% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago83% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | 3 days ago69% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | 3 days ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | 3 days ago70% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago84% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 13 days ago83% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago65% | 3 days ago71% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago62% | 3 days ago81% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | 3 days ago87% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWPX has been loosely correlated with IIIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NWPX jumps, then IIIN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NWPX | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NWPX | 100% | +1.96% | ||
IIIN - NWPX | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.20% | ||
ZEUS - NWPX | 49% Loosely correlated | +4.05% | ||
MTUS - NWPX | 49% Loosely correlated | +3.26% | ||
MATW - NWPX | 49% Loosely correlated | +20.99% | ||
PRLB - NWPX | 48% Loosely correlated | +4.43% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that RCMT and MATW have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RCMT and MATW's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RCMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RCMT | 100% | -0.05% | ||
MATW - RCMT | 27% Poorly correlated | +20.99% | ||
HON - RCMT | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.34% | ||
MEC - RCMT | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.60% | ||
NWPX - RCMT | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.96% | ||
VMI - RCMT | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.99% | ||
More |