Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWWKX vs ONCFX
NWWKX vs ONCFX Comparison
Open Charts NWWKX vs ONCFX
NWWKX vs ONCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWWKX vs. ONCFX commentary
Jun 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWWKX is a Hold and ONCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ONCFX has more cash in the bank: 4.31B vs. NWWKX (210M). NWWKX pays higher dividends than ONCFX: NWWKX (3.85) vs ONCFX (3.43). NWWKX was incepted earlier than ONCFX: NWWKX (12 years) vs ONCFX (30 years). NWWKX (0.68) and ONCFX (0.67) have similar cost to investors . NWWKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.92 vs. ONCFX (11.00). NWWKX has a lower initial minimum investment than ONCFX: NWWKX (50000) vs ONCFX (1000000). NWWKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.02 vs. ONCFX (9.44). NWWKX (12.11) and ONCFX (11.73) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NWWKX | ONCFX | NWWKX / ONCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.67 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.67 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.754 | 3.490 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 1000000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000000 | - |
| Net Assets | 210M | 4.31B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.85 | 3.43 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.02 | 9.44 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.21 | 25.64 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.11 | 11.73 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.12 | 39.58 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement