Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWWKX vs VTMFX
NWWKX vs VTMFX Comparison
Open Charts NWWKX vs VTMFX
Nationwide Inv Dest Mod Cnsrv Instl Svc
Price$10.33
Change+$0.04 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets220.4M
Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Adm
Price$49.34
Change+$0.18 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.48B
NWWKX vs VTMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWWKX vs. VTMFX commentary
Nov 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWWKX is a Hold and VTMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTMFX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. NWWKX (220M). NWWKX pays higher dividends than VTMFX: NWWKX (3.18) vs VTMFX (2.08). NWWKX was incepted earlier than VTMFX: NWWKX (12 years) vs VTMFX (31 years). NWWKX (0.60) is less costly to investors than VTMFX (0.09). NWWKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.30 vs. VTMFX (20.00). VTMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWWKX: VTMFX (10000) vs NWWKX (50000). VTMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.23 vs. NWWKX (2.11). VTMFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.80 vs. NWWKX (13.90).
| NWWKX | VTMFX | NWWKX / VTMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.09 | 667% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.09 | 667% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.589 | 9.145 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 10000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 220M | 11.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.18 | 2.08 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.11 | 7.23 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.04 | 36.08 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.90 | 37.80 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.87 | 92.38 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers