Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWWKX vs VTMFX
NWWKX vs VTMFX Comparison
Open Charts NWWKX vs VTMFX
NWWKX vs VTMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWWKX vs. VTMFX commentary
Jun 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWWKX is a Hold and VTMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTMFX has more cash in the bank: 12.3B vs. NWWKX (210M). NWWKX pays higher dividends than VTMFX: NWWKX (3.85) vs VTMFX (2.11). NWWKX was incepted earlier than VTMFX: NWWKX (12 years) vs VTMFX (32 years). NWWKX (0.68) is less costly to investors than VTMFX (0.05). NWWKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.92 vs. VTMFX (15.00). VTMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWWKX: VTMFX (10000) vs NWWKX (50000). VTMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.25 vs. NWWKX (13.02). VTMFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.68 vs. NWWKX (12.11).
| NWWKX | VTMFX | NWWKX / VTMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.05 | 1,360% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.05 | 1,360% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.754 | 5.262 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 10000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 210M | 12.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.85 | 2.11 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.02 | 14.25 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.21 | 37.12 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.11 | 33.68 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.12 | 98.58 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers