Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWWKX vs VTMFX
NWWKX vs VTMFX Comparison
Open Charts NWWKX vs VTMFX
NWWKX vs VTMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWWKX vs. VTMFX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWWKX is a Hold and VTMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTMFX has more cash in the bank: 12.3B vs. NWWKX (198M). NWWKX pays higher dividends than VTMFX: NWWKX (3.86) vs VTMFX (2.19). NWWKX was incepted earlier than VTMFX: NWWKX (13 years) vs VTMFX (32 years). NWWKX (0.68) is less costly to investors than VTMFX (0.05). NWWKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.92 vs. VTMFX (15.00). VTMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWWKX: VTMFX (10000) vs NWWKX (50000). NWWKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. VTMFX (4.39). VTMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.34 vs. NWWKX (9.66).
| NWWKX | VTMFX | NWWKX / VTMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.05 | 1,360% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.05 | 1,360% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.121 | 2.946 | 174% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 10000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 198M | 12.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.86 | 2.19 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.67 | 4.39 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.99 | 31.85 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.66 | 27.34 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.34 | 93.79 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement