Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWWLX vs PACAX
NWWLX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts NWWLX vs PACAX
NWWLX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWWLX vs. PACAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWWLX is a Hold and PACAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 850M vs. NWWLX (233M). NWWLX pays higher dividends than PACAX: NWWLX (3.89) vs PACAX (2.74). NWWLX was incepted earlier than PACAX: NWWLX (12 years) vs PACAX (33 years). PACAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than NWWLX (0.62). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. NWWLX (32.77). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWWLX: PACAX (0) vs NWWLX (50000). PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.76 vs. NWWLX (6.53). NWWLX return over 5 years is better than : 9.34 vs. PACAX (8.80).
| NWWLX | PACAX | NWWLX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.96 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.96 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.578 | 4.378 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 233M | 850M | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.89 | 2.74 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.53 | 7.76 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.33 | 32.43 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.34 | 8.80 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.35 | 36.71 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement