Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWWLX vs PACAX
NWWLX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts NWWLX vs PACAX
NWWLX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWWLX vs. PACAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWWLX is a Buy and PACAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 844M vs. NWWLX (234M). NWWLX pays higher dividends than PACAX: NWWLX (3.86) vs PACAX (3.03). NWWLX was incepted earlier than PACAX: NWWLX (12 years) vs PACAX (32 years). PACAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than NWWLX (0.62). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. NWWLX (32.77). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWWLX: PACAX (0) vs NWWLX (50000). PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.86 vs. NWWLX (7.61). NWWLX (9.43) and PACAX (9.15) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NWWLX | PACAX | NWWLX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.96 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.96 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.378 | 3.962 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 234M | 844M | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.86 | 3.03 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.61 | 8.86 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.60 | 28.88 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.43 | 9.15 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.99 | 37.52 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement