Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWZLX vs RGAEX
NWZLX vs RGAEX Comparison
Open Charts NWZLX vs RGAEX
NWZLX vs RGAEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWZLX vs. RGAEX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWZLX is a Buy and RGAEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAEX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. NWZLX (209M). RGAEX pays higher dividends than NWZLX: RGAEX (0.21) vs NWZLX (0.00). NWZLX was incepted earlier than RGAEX: NWZLX (9 years) vs RGAEX (24 years). NWZLX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RGAEX (0.63). RGAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NWZLX (11.29). RGAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZLX: RGAEX (250) vs NWZLX (2000). RGAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.00 vs. NWZLX (-11.40). RGAEX return over 5 years is better than : 12.98 vs. NWZLX (-0.52).
| NWZLX | RGAEX | NWZLX / RGAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.63 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.63 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.626 | 9.051 | -7% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 209M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.40 | -0.00 | 2,534,764% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.26 | 42.68 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.52 | 12.98 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 105.92 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers