Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWZMX vs RGAEX
NWZMX vs RGAEX Comparison
Open Charts NWZMX vs RGAEX
NWZMX vs RGAEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWZMX vs. RGAEX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWZMX is a Buy and RGAEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAEX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. NWZMX (209M). RGAEX pays higher dividends than NWZMX: RGAEX (0.21) vs NWZMX (0.00). NWZMX was incepted earlier than RGAEX: NWZMX (9 years) vs RGAEX (24 years). NWZMX (0.92) is less costly to investors than RGAEX (0.63). RGAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NWZMX (11.29). RGAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZMX: RGAEX (250) vs NWZMX (1000000). RGAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.00 vs. NWZMX (-10.71). RGAEX return over 5 years is better than : 12.98 vs. NWZMX (2.93).
| NWZMX | RGAEX | NWZMX / RGAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.63 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.63 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.349 | 9.051 | -4% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 209M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.71 | -0.00 | 2,382,161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.04 | 42.68 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.93 | 12.98 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 105.92 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers