NXG
Price
$56.23
Change
-$0.65 (-1.14%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
447.95M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XLE
Price
$63.64
Change
-$0.11 (-0.17%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
41.88B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NXG vs XLE

NXG vs XLE Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) vs. State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE)

Key Takeaways

  • NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) is an actively managed closed-end fund targeting infrastructure securities with an emphasis on energy infrastructure, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) is a passive exchange-traded fund providing concentrated exposure to U.S. energy companies.
  • NXG employs leverage and maintains a higher expense ratio of approximately 4.16%, compared to XLE’s low-cost structure with an expense ratio of 0.08%.
  • XLE holds approximately 22 securities with heavy concentration in the largest energy firms, whereas NXG offers broader diversification across roughly 64 holdings spanning energy, industrial, sustainable, and technology infrastructure.
  • Both funds provide exposure to the energy sector but differ in strategy: NXG focuses on income generation through equity and debt securities with potential leverage, while XLE delivers market-cap-weighted sector exposure without leverage.
  • Structural differences position NXG for investors seeking higher income potential with elevated risk, whereas XLE suits those preferring low-cost, liquid, passive energy sector participation.
  • Recent market cycles highlight XLE’s sensitivity to commodity price swings and XLE’s top holdings performance, while NXG’s leveraged profile amplifies both gains and volatility in infrastructure themes.

Introduction

Investors comparing NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) gain insight into two distinct approaches to energy-related exposure. NXG operates as a closed-end fund with an active, leveraged strategy spanning infrastructure assets, while XLE functions as a low-cost, passive vehicle tracking the energy sector. These funds do not compete directly but offer alternative paths for investors targeting energy and infrastructure themes amid evolving commodity trends and sector rotation. The comparison clarifies structural, cost, and exposure differences relevant for portfolio positioning.

NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) Overview

NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) is a closed-end fund launched in 2012 that seeks high total return with emphasis on current income. The fund invests at least 80% of its net assets in equity and debt securities of infrastructure companies, including energy, industrial, sustainable, and technology and communication infrastructure. It holds approximately 64 securities and applies leverage of around 30%. Management fees stand at 1.00% with a total expense ratio of 4.16% after waivers. Distinguishing features include active management by Cushing Asset Management LP and a focus on income generation through a diversified infrastructure mandate.

State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) Overview

State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) is a passive exchange-traded fund that seeks to replicate the performance of the Energy Select Sector Index. It provides exposure to companies in oil, gas, consumable fuels, and energy equipment and services. XLE typically holds about 22 securities with the top 10 accounting for roughly 73% of assets, led by major integrated oil firms. The expense ratio is 0.08%. As a market-cap-weighted product without leverage, it offers liquid, low-cost access to the U.S. energy sector through straightforward index replication and periodic rebalancing.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The energy sector remains influenced by global oil demand, supply dynamics, geopolitical developments, and the transition toward sustainable infrastructure. Capital flows into energy infrastructure reflect ongoing needs for reliable power and transportation networks, while regulatory shifts around emissions and renewables create both opportunities and risks. Macroeconomic drivers such as interest rate expectations and commodity price cycles affect capital allocation across energy and infrastructure assets. Sector risks include volatility in crude oil prices, regulatory changes, and evolving capital expenditure patterns among major producers.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, XLE has demonstrated sensitivity to energy commodity trends and earnings from its concentrated holdings, reflecting broader sector rotation patterns. NXG’s leveraged structure has amplified exposure to infrastructure income themes, leading to distinct volatility profiles relative to XLE. Both funds respond to macroeconomic shifts including interest rate movements and global energy demand, yet their positioning diverges: XLE emphasizes large-cap energy producers, while NXG spreads risk across multiple infrastructure sub-sectors. Relative performance has varied with commodity cycles and infrastructure spending trends in recent months.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking to apply similar analytical rigor to funds like NXG and XLE may explore the platform for additional insights.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural strength, cost efficiency, and diversification profile, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Its low expense ratio, passive methodology, and liquid market-cap-weighted approach provide clearer alignment with broad energy sector momentum while limiting structural costs and leverage-related risks compared to NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG).

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
NXG vs. XLE commentary
Aug 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NXG is a Hold and XLE is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLE has more net assets: 41.9B vs. NXG (448M). XLE has a higher annual dividend yield than NXG: XLE (44.303) vs NXG (21.725). NXG was incepted earlier than XLE: NXG (14 years) vs XLE (28 years). XLE (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than NXG (2.77). NXG has a higher turnover XLE (10.00) vs XLE (10.00).
NXGXLENXG / XLE
Gain YTD21.72544.30349%
Net Assets448M41.9B1%
Total Expense Ratio2.770.083,463%
Turnover76.3910.00764%
Yield0.002.55-
Fund Existence14 years28 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NXGXLE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NXG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XLE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EWUS45.950.48
+1.06%
iShares MSCI United Kingdom Small-Cp ETF
FNY105.000.72
+0.69%
First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX® ETF
AKRE60.520.39
+0.65%
Akre Focus ETF
DEW73.100.16
+0.22%
WisdomTree Global High Dividend ETF
KEEX27.17-1.06
-3.75%
Defiance Daily Target 2x Long KEEL ETF

NXG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NXG and ET have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NXG and ET's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NXG
1D Price
Change %
NXG100%
-1.14%
ET - NXG
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
PAGP - NXG
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
KMI - NXG
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
OKE - NXG
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.34%
WES - NXG
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
More