NXTBF
Price
$0.73
Change
+$0.22 (+43.14%)
Updated
Jan 22 closing price
Capitalization
86.87M
SEPJF
Price
$33.55
Change
+$0.28 (+0.84%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.69B
Ad is loading...

NXTBF vs SEPJF

Header iconNXTBF vs SEPJF Comparison
Open Charts NXTBF vs SEPJFBanner chart's image
Next Biometrics Group AS
Price$0.73
Change+$0.22 (+43.14%)
Volume$100
Capitalization86.87M
Spectris
Price$33.55
Change+$0.28 (+0.84%)
Volume$677
Capitalization4.69B
NXTBF vs SEPJF Comparison Chart
Loading...
SEPJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NXTBF vs. SEPJF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NXTBF is a Hold and SEPJF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (NXTBF: $0.73 vs. SEPJF: $33.55)
Brand notoriety: NXTBF and SEPJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NXTBF: 100% vs. SEPJF: 29%
Market capitalization -- NXTBF: $86.87M vs. SEPJF: $4.69B
NXTBF [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] is valued at $86.87M. SEPJF’s [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] market capitalization is $4.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry ranges from $109.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry is $5.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NXTBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSEPJF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NXTBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SEPJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NXTBF and SEPJF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SEPJF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SEPJF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

NXTBF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SEPJF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was +2.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was +4.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.76%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (+4.68% weekly)

This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SEPJF($4.69B) has a higher market cap than NXTBF($86.9M). SEPJF YTD gains are higher at: 9.856 vs. NXTBF (0.000). SEPJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 304M vs. NXTBF (-55.64M). SEPJF has more cash in the bank: 122M vs. NXTBF (86.2M). NXTBF has less debt than SEPJF: NXTBF (2.46M) vs SEPJF (293M). SEPJF has higher revenues than NXTBF: SEPJF (1.33B) vs NXTBF (32.1M).
NXTBFSEPJFNXTBF / SEPJF
Capitalization86.9M4.69B2%
EBITDA-55.64M304M-18%
Gain YTD0.0009.856-
P/E RatioN/A25.64-
Revenue32.1M1.33B2%
Total Cash86.2M122M71%
Total Debt2.46M293M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NXTBF vs SEPJF: Fundamental Ratings
NXTBF
SEPJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2931
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
42100
SMR RATING
1..100
9646
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4756
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10096
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SEPJF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NXTBF (59). This means that SEPJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NXTBF’s over the last 12 months.

NXTBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SEPJF (100). This means that NXTBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SEPJF’s over the last 12 months.

SEPJF's SMR Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NXTBF (96). This means that SEPJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NXTBF’s over the last 12 months.

NXTBF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as SEPJF (56). This means that NXTBF’s stock grew similarly to SEPJF’s over the last 12 months.

SEPJF's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as NXTBF (100). This means that SEPJF’s stock grew similarly to NXTBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NXTBFSEPJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
8%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SEPJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EBMT15.250.17
+1.13%
Eagle Bancorp Montana
DAVA31.550.05
+0.16%
Endava plc
BSAC19.050.01
+0.05%
Banco Santander-Chile
EBF20.70-0.03
-0.14%
Ennis
LXEH4.92-0.43
-8.12%
Lixiang Education Holding Co Ltd

NXTBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NXTBF and SEPJF have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NXTBF and SEPJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NXTBF
1D Price
Change %
NXTBF100%
N/A
SEPJF - NXTBF
18%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
SOBR - NXTBF
3%
Poorly correlated
-9.62%
SIGL - NXTBF
2%
Poorly correlated
+25.65%
SILLF - NXTBF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RNSHF - NXTBF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SEPJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SEPJF and HXGBY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SEPJF and HXGBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEPJF
1D Price
Change %
SEPJF100%
+0.83%
HXGBY - SEPJF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.51%
HXGBF - SEPJF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ITRI - SEPJF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
NXTBF - SEPJF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QURT - SEPJF
11%
Poorly correlated
-3.81%
More