NXTBF
Price
$0.73
Change
+$0.22 (+43.14%)
Updated
Jan 22 closing price
Capitalization
86.87M
SIGL
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
470.7K
Ad is loading...

NXTBF vs SIGL

Header iconNXTBF vs SIGL Comparison
Open Charts NXTBF vs SIGLBanner chart's image
Next Biometrics Group AS
Price$0.73
Change+$0.22 (+43.14%)
Volume$100
Capitalization86.87M
Signal Advance
Price$0.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.2K
Capitalization470.7K
NXTBF vs SIGL Comparison Chart
Loading...
SIGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NXTBF vs. SIGL commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NXTBF is a Hold and SIGL is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (NXTBF: $0.73 vs. SIGL: $0.20)
Brand notoriety: NXTBF and SIGL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NXTBF: 100% vs. SIGL: 20%
Market capitalization -- NXTBF: $86.87M vs. SIGL: $470.7K
NXTBF [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] is valued at $86.87M. SIGL’s [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] market capitalization is $470.7K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry ranges from $109.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry is $5.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NXTBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSIGL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NXTBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SIGL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SIGL is a better buy in the long-term than NXTBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SIGL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SIGL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

NXTBF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SIGL (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was +34.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was +6.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +23.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

SIGL is expected to report earnings on Apr 20, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (+6.52% weekly)

This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NXTBF($86.9M) has a higher market cap than SIGL($471K). SIGL YTD gains are higher at: 181.690 vs. NXTBF (0.000). SIGL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -178.81K vs. NXTBF (-55.64M). NXTBF has more cash in the bank: 86.2M vs. SIGL (114). SIGL has less debt than NXTBF: SIGL (12.4K) vs NXTBF (2.46M). NXTBF has higher revenues than SIGL: NXTBF (32.1M) vs SIGL (0).
NXTBFSIGLNXTBF / SIGL
Capitalization86.9M471K18,450%
EBITDA-55.64M-178.81K31,117%
Gain YTD0.000181.690-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue32.1M0-
Total Cash86.2M11475,614,035%
Total Debt2.46M12.4K19,863%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NXTBF vs SIGL: Fundamental Ratings
NXTBF
SIGL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2924
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4498
SMR RATING
1..100
961
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6934
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10011
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SIGL's Valuation (58) in the null industry is in the same range as NXTBF (74). This means that SIGL’s stock grew similarly to NXTBF’s over the last 12 months.

NXTBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SIGL (98). This means that NXTBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SIGL’s over the last 12 months.

SIGL's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NXTBF (96). This means that SIGL’s stock grew significantly faster than NXTBF’s over the last 12 months.

SIGL's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NXTBF (69). This means that SIGL’s stock grew somewhat faster than NXTBF’s over the last 12 months.

SIGL's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NXTBF (100). This means that SIGL’s stock grew significantly faster than NXTBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NXTBFSIGL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
8%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SIGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA400.2811.18
+2.87%
Tesla
GME27.990.48
+1.74%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X104735.3050001032.101600
+1.00%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY605.043.23
+0.54%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL237.59-1.77
-0.74%
Apple

NXTBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NXTBF and SEPJF have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NXTBF and SEPJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NXTBF
1D Price
Change %
NXTBF100%
N/A
SEPJF - NXTBF
18%
Poorly correlated
+2.65%
SOBR - NXTBF
3%
Poorly correlated
+5.65%
SIGL - NXTBF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SILLF - NXTBF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RNSHF - NXTBF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SIGL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SIGL and NSCIF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIGL and NSCIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIGL
1D Price
Change %
SIGL100%
N/A
NSCIF - SIGL
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
LCTC - SIGL
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NXTBF - SIGL
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RNSHF - SIGL
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QURT - SIGL
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More