Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OAKBX vs RLBAX
OAKBX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts OAKBX vs RLBAX
Oakmark Equity And Income Investor
Price$36.57
Change-$0.34 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.14B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$35.31
Change-$0.31 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.39B
OAKBX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OAKBX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OAKBX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. OAKBX (6.14B). OAKBX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: OAKBX (2.08) vs RLBAX (1.23). OAKBX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: OAKBX (30 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than OAKBX (0.85). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. OAKBX (38.00). OAKBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: OAKBX (0) vs RLBAX (250). OAKBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.42 vs. RLBAX (4.45). OAKBX return over 5 years is better than : 49.01 vs. RLBAX (34.05).
| OAKBX | RLBAX | OAKBX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.31 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.31 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.278 | 4.085 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.14B | 244B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.08 | 1.23 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.42 | 4.45 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.43 | 30.02 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.01 | 34.05 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.57 | 51.23 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement