Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OAKBX vs RLBAX
OAKBX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts OAKBX vs RLBAX
OAKBX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OAKBX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OAKBX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. OAKBX (5.91B). OAKBX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: OAKBX (2.19) vs RLBAX (1.14). OAKBX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: OAKBX (31 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than OAKBX (0.85). OAKBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). OAKBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: OAKBX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.80 vs. OAKBX (7.54). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.83 vs. OAKBX (17.34).
| OAKBX | RLBAX | OAKBX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.32 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.32 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.873 | 8.988 | -10% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.91B | 288B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.19 | 1.14 | 193% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.54 | 15.80 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.24 | 41.07 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.34 | 31.83 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.03 | 80.24 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement