Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OANBX vs RLBAX
OANBX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts OANBX vs RLBAX
Oakmark Equity and Income Institutional
Price$38.40
Change+$0.12 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.24B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$39.04
Change+$0.26 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.39B
OANBX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OANBX vs. RLBAX commentary
Oct 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OANBX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 268B vs. OANBX (6.24B). OANBX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: OANBX (2.40) vs RLBAX (1.10). OANBX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: OANBX (9 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than OANBX (0.59). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. OANBX (38.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than OANBX: RLBAX (250) vs OANBX (250000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.11 vs. OANBX (9.24). OANBX return over 5 years is better than : 46.69 vs. RLBAX (39.90).
| OANBX | RLBAX | OANBX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.31 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.31 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.021 | 15.186 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.24B | 268B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.40 | 1.10 | 218% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.24 | 10.11 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.39 | 45.77 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.69 | 39.90 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 67.03 | - |