Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OAZBX vs RLBAX
OAZBX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts OAZBX vs RLBAX
OAZBX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. OAZBX (5.84B). OAZBX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: OAZBX (2.51) vs RLBAX (1.11). OAZBX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: OAZBX (6 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than OAZBX (0.56). OAZBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than OAZBX: RLBAX (250) vs OAZBX (1000000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.17 vs. OAZBX (9.18). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.90 vs. OAZBX (23.28).
| OAZBX | RLBAX | OAZBX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.32 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.32 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.086 | 8.124 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.84B | 288B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.51 | 1.11 | 226% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.18 | 11.17 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.90 | 36.52 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.28 | 28.90 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 72.56 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement