Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OAZMX vs RMFCX
OAZMX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts OAZMX vs RMFCX
OAZMX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. OAZMX (24B). OAZMX (1.20) and RMFCX (1.16) have matching dividends . OAZMX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: OAZMX (6 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than OAZMX (0.61). OAZMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than OAZMX: RMFCX (250) vs OAZMX (1000000). OAZMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.80 vs. RMFCX (8.88). OAZMX return over 5 years is better than : 64.95 vs. RMFCX (37.23).
| OAZMX | RMFCX | OAZMX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.91 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.91 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.685 | 9.137 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24B | 118B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.16 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.80 | 8.88 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.55 | 34.84 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.95 | 37.23 | 174% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement