ODDAF vs SHMY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ODDAF is a Hold and SHMY is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ODDAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSHMY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ODDAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SHMY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ODDAF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- ODDAF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ODDAF (@Restaurants) experienced а -22.04% price change this week, while SHMY (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.14%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Restaurants (-5.24% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
| ODDAF | SHMY | ODDAF / SHMY | |
| Capitalization | 16.2M | 4.58M | 354% |
| EBITDA | -2.04M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.528 | -16.435 | -113% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.26M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 73.8K | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 3.16M | N/A | - |
| ODDAF | SHMY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 3% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 3% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| FOREX / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CADCHF | 0.62 | N/A | N/A |
| Canadian Dollar - Switzerland Franc | |||
| CNYHKD | 1.07 | N/A | N/A |
| China Yuan - Hong Kong Dollar | |||
| DBND | 45.44 | -0.32 | -0.70% |
| DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF | |||
| GSEE | 44.88 | -1.14 | -2.48% |
| Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emer Mkt Eq ETF | |||
| SIVR | 28.16 | -0.98 | -3.36% |
| abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | |||
ODDAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ODDAF and TNGPF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ODDAF and TNGPF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ODDAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ODDAF | 100% | -31.44% | ||
| TNGPF - ODDAF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PTLO - ODDAF | 11% Poorly correlated | -1.89% | ||
| FWRG - ODDAF | 8% Poorly correlated | -5.17% | ||
| BTBD - ODDAF | 4% Poorly correlated | -3.05% | ||
| JDWPY - ODDAF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SHMY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SHMY and DPUKY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHMY and DPUKY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHMY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHMY | 100% | N/A | ||
| DPUKY - SHMY | 23% Poorly correlated | -5.69% | ||
| BTBD - SHMY | 5% Poorly correlated | -3.05% | ||
| REBN - SHMY | 3% Poorly correlated | +6.78% | ||
| ODDAF - SHMY | 0% Poorly correlated | -31.44% | ||
| GAMN - SHMY | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||