OLO
Price
$10.26
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
1.74B
28 days until earnings call
RSSS
Price
$3.53
Change
+$0.10 (+2.92%)
Updated
Oct 8, 04:50 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
112.58M
29 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

OLO vs RSSS

Header iconOLO vs RSSS Comparison
Open Charts OLO vs RSSSBanner chart's image
Olo
Price$10.26
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$18.72M
Capitalization1.74B
Research Solutions
Price$3.53
Change+$0.10 (+2.92%)
Volume$200
Capitalization112.58M
OLO vs RSSS Comparison Chart in %
OLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSSS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OLO vs. RSSS commentary
Oct 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OLO is a Hold and RSSS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 09, 2025
Stock price -- (OLO: $10.26 vs. RSSS: $3.43)
Brand notoriety: OLO and RSSS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OLO: 184% vs. RSSS: 91%
Market capitalization -- OLO: $1.74B vs. RSSS: $112.58M
OLO [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.74B. RSSS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $112.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $315.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OLO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRSSS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OLO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RSSS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OLO is a better buy in the long-term than RSSS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OLO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSSS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OLO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RSSS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OLO is a better buy in the short-term than RSSS.

Price Growth

OLO (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RSSS (@Packaged Software) price change was -8.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +202.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

OLO is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

RSSS is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.18% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OLO($1.74B) has a higher market cap than RSSS($113M). OLO has higher P/E ratio than RSSS: OLO (1036.00) vs RSSS (85.75). OLO YTD gains are higher at: 33.594 vs. RSSS (-17.349). OLO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.6M vs. RSSS (3.09M). OLO has more cash in the bank: 377M vs. RSSS (9.85M). OLO has higher revenues than RSSS: OLO (314M) vs RSSS (48.8M).
OLORSSSOLO / RSSS
Capitalization1.74B113M1,541%
EBITDA16.6M3.09M538%
Gain YTD33.594-17.349-194%
P/E Ratio1036.0085.751,208%
Revenue314M48.8M643%
Total Cash377M9.85M3,827%
Total Debt12.7MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OLO vs RSSS: Fundamental Ratings
OLO
RSSS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3879
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8666
SMR RATING
1..100
9297
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4143
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2757
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OLO's Valuation (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RSSS (77). This means that OLO’s stock grew somewhat faster than RSSS’s over the last 12 months.

RSSS's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as OLO (86). This means that RSSS’s stock grew similarly to OLO’s over the last 12 months.

OLO's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as RSSS (97). This means that OLO’s stock grew similarly to RSSS’s over the last 12 months.

OLO's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as RSSS (43). This means that OLO’s stock grew similarly to RSSS’s over the last 12 months.

OLO's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as RSSS (57). This means that OLO’s stock grew similarly to RSSS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OLORSSS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSSS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL256.48-0.21
-0.08%
Apple
SPY669.12-2.49
-0.37%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X121451.380000-3301.148400
-2.65%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME24.35-0.70
-2.79%
GameStop Corp
TSLA433.09-20.16
-4.45%
Tesla

RSSS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RSSS and MSGM have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSSS and MSGM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSSS
1D Price
Change %
RSSS100%
-4.72%
MSGM - RSSS
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
BMBL - RSSS
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
OLO - RSSS
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BL - RSSS
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.06%
SPT - RSSS
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.08%
More