Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OLVCX vs RMFCX
OLVCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts OLVCX vs RMFCX
OLVCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OLVCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OLVCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. OLVCX (5.07B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than OLVCX: RMFCX (1.15) vs OLVCX (0.41). OLVCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: OLVCX (27 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). OLVCX (1.50) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). OLVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 185.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than OLVCX: RMFCX (250) vs OLVCX (1000). OLVCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.47 vs. RMFCX (9.14). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. OLVCX (26.08).
| OLVCX | RMFCX | OLVCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.91 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.91 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.412 | 10.454 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.07B | 118B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 1.15 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.47 | 9.14 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.01 | 38.82 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.08 | 36.70 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.33 | 92.27 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement