Advertisement
OMDA vs VEEV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMDA is a Hold and VEEV is a Hold.
VEEV | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| OMDA | VEEV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 84% | 8 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 61% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
OMDA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while VEEV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- OMDA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- VEEV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
OMDA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VEEV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- OMDA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- VEEV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
OMDA (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а +3.50% price change this week, while VEEV (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was +2.58% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +1.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.72%.
Reported Earning Dates
OMDA is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
VEEV is expected to report earnings on Dec 09, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Services to the Health Industry (+1.81% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
Advertisement
OMDA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMDA has been loosely correlated with VEEV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OMDA jumps, then VEEV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OMDA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMDA | 100% | -1.92% | ||
| VEEV - OMDA | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| EVH - OMDA | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.87% | ||
| TEM - OMDA | 32% Poorly correlated | -6.59% | ||
| PRVA - OMDA | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.73% | ||
| WEAV - OMDA | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
VEEV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VEEV has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VEEV jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VEEV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VEEV | 100% | -1.23% | ||
| CLSK - VEEV | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.80% | ||
| COIN - VEEV | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| RIOT - VEEV | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.68% | ||
| WAY - VEEV | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| PHR - VEEV | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
More | ||||