OMF
Price
$57.11
Change
+$0.75 (+1.33%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
6.79B
6 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
PMTS
Price
$17.34
Change
+$0.12 (+0.70%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
196.59M
10 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

OMF vs PMTS

Header iconOMF vs PMTS Comparison
Open Charts OMF vs PMTSBanner chart's image
OneMain Holdings
Price$57.11
Change+$0.75 (+1.33%)
Volume$1.02M
Capitalization6.79B
CPI Card Group
Price$17.34
Change+$0.12 (+0.70%)
Volume$32.24K
Capitalization196.59M
OMF vs PMTS Comparison Chart in %
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OMF vs. PMTS commentary
Oct 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMF is a StrongBuy and PMTS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 25, 2025
Stock price -- (OMF: $57.11 vs. PMTS: $17.34)
Brand notoriety: OMF and PMTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OMF: 105% vs. PMTS: 77%
Market capitalization -- OMF: $6.79B vs. PMTS: $196.59M
OMF [@Savings Banks] is valued at $6.79B. PMTS’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $196.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $674.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OMF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePMTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PMTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than PMTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMTS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PMTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PMTS is a better buy in the short-term than OMF.

Price Growth

OMF (@Savings Banks) experienced а +5.51% price change this week, while PMTS (@Savings Banks) price change was +14.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +3.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

OMF is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

PMTS is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+3.94% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMF($6.79B) has a higher market cap than PMTS($197M). PMTS has higher P/E ratio than OMF: PMTS (15.62) vs OMF (10.29). OMF YTD gains are higher at: 16.107 vs. PMTS (-41.987). PMTS has less debt than OMF: PMTS (323M) vs OMF (22.1B). OMF has higher revenues than PMTS: OMF (4.76B) vs PMTS (502M).
OMFPMTSOMF / PMTS
Capitalization6.79B197M3,446%
EBITDAN/A75.4M-
Gain YTD16.107-41.987-38%
P/E Ratio10.2915.6266%
Revenue4.76B502M948%
Total CashN/A17.1M-
Total Debt22.1B323M6,842%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMF vs PMTS: Fundamental Ratings
OMF
PMTS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
525
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2467
SMR RATING
1..100
8100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5264
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4038
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8520

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMF's Valuation (50) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PMTS (50) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to PMTS’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PMTS (67) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PMTS’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's SMR Rating (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for PMTS (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that OMF’s stock grew significantly faster than PMTS’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PMTS (64) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to PMTS’s over the last 12 months.

PMTS's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as OMF (40) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PMTS’s stock grew similarly to OMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMFPMTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMLM0.080.01
+16.05%
American Lithium Minerals, Inc.
MCBK25.790.03
+0.12%
Madison County Financial, Inc.
WYGPY9.08N/A
N/A
Worley Ltd.
SUCEF26.93N/A
N/A
Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd.
FUJIY11.61-0.03
-0.26%
FUJIFILM Holdings Corp.

PMTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMTS has been loosely correlated with VSTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMTS jumps, then VSTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMTS
1D Price
Change %
PMTS100%
+0.70%
VSTS - PMTS
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.53%
SEZL - PMTS
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
OMF - PMTS
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
ENVA - PMTS
41%
Loosely correlated
+9.36%
SYF - PMTS
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.18%
More