OMF
Price
$51.87
Change
-$1.29 (-2.43%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
6.02B
38 days until earnings call
R
Price
$147.31
Change
-$2.34 (-1.56%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
5.32B
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

OMF vs R

Header iconOMF vs R Comparison
Open Charts OMF vs RBanner chart's image
OneMain Holdings
Price$51.87
Change-$1.29 (-2.43%)
Volume$656.18K
Capitalization6.02B
Ryder System
Price$147.31
Change-$2.34 (-1.56%)
Volume$221.71K
Capitalization5.32B
OMF vs R Comparison Chart
Loading...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OMF vs. R commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMF is a Hold and R is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (OMF: $51.87 vs. R: $147.31)
Brand notoriety: OMF and R are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OMF: 63% vs. R: 60%
Market capitalization -- OMF: $6.02B vs. R: $5.32B
OMF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $6.02B. R’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $5.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OMF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OMF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • R’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than R.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while R’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • R’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, R is a better buy in the short-term than OMF.

Price Growth

OMF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -2.77% price change this week, while R (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -2.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

OMF is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

R is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-0.50% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMF($6.02B) has a higher market cap than R($5.32B). R has higher P/E ratio than OMF: R (13.76) vs OMF (9.44). OMF YTD gains are higher at: 3.512 vs. R (-5.143). R has less debt than OMF: R (8.15B) vs OMF (19.8B). R has higher revenues than OMF: R (11.8B) vs OMF (4.28B).
OMFROMF / R
Capitalization6.02B5.32B113%
EBITDAN/A2.73B-
Gain YTD3.512-5.143-68%
P/E Ratio9.4413.7669%
Revenue4.28B11.8B36%
Total CashN/A204M-
Total Debt19.8B8.15B243%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMF vs R: Fundamental Ratings
OMF
R
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6060
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
208
SMR RATING
1..100
651
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5157
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3174
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMF's Valuation (10) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as R (36). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to R’s over the last 12 months.

R's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as OMF (20). This means that R’s stock grew similarly to OMF’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's SMR Rating (6) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for R (51). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than R’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as R (57). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to R’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for R (74). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than R’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMFR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCSH24.180.06
+0.25%
Federated Hermes Short Duration Corp ETF
FTQI19.21-0.08
-0.41%
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
FXZ56.33-0.28
-0.49%
First Trust Materials AlphaDEX® ETF
FDCF41.22-0.36
-0.87%
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
TDIV86.02-0.93
-1.07%
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Div ETF

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
-2.43%
ENVA - OMF
84%
Closely correlated
-1.65%
COF - OMF
82%
Closely correlated
-2.45%
AXP - OMF
81%
Closely correlated
-3.42%
SLM - OMF
77%
Closely correlated
-1.36%
BFH - OMF
76%
Closely correlated
-5.34%
More