OMF
Price
$51.42
Change
-$2.36 (-4.39%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
49 days until earnings call
WRLD
Price
$110.25
Change
-$5.94 (-5.11%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:45 PM (EDT)
43 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

OMF vs WRLD

Header iconOMF vs WRLD Comparison
Open Charts OMF vs WRLDBanner chart's image
OneMain Holdings
Price$51.42
Change-$2.36 (-4.39%)
Volume$7.68K
CapitalizationN/A
World Acceptance
Price$110.25
Change-$5.94 (-5.11%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
OMF vs WRLD Comparison Chart
Loading...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OMF vs. WRLD commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMF is a Hold and WRLD is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (OMF: $53.78 vs. WRLD: $116.19)
Brand notoriety: OMF and WRLD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OMF: 79% vs. WRLD: 99%
Market capitalization -- OMF: $6.02B vs. WRLD: $881.52M
OMF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $6.02B. WRLD’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $881.52M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OMF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileWRLD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OMF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • WRLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than WRLD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WRLD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WRLD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the short-term than WRLD.

Price Growth

OMF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -1.92% price change this week, while WRLD (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -3.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -5.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

OMF is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

WRLD is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-5.00% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMF($6.02B) has a higher market cap than WRLD($882M). WRLD has higher P/E ratio than OMF: WRLD (12.23) vs OMF (9.44). OMF YTD gains are higher at: 18.779 vs. WRLD (-10.986). WRLD has less debt than OMF: WRLD (667M) vs OMF (19.8B). OMF has higher revenues than WRLD: OMF (4.28B) vs WRLD (526M).
OMFWRLDOMF / WRLD
Capitalization6.02B882M682%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.779-10.986-171%
P/E Ratio9.4412.2377%
Revenue4.28B526M814%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt19.8B667M2,969%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMF vs WRLD: Fundamental Ratings
OMF
WRLD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1464
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2285
SMR RATING
1..100
712
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4559
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2490
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMF's Valuation (9) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WRLD (63). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WRLD’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WRLD (85). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WRLD’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's SMR Rating (7) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as WRLD (12). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to WRLD’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as WRLD (59). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to WRLD’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for WRLD (90). This means that OMF’s stock grew significantly faster than WRLD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMFWRLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEDM49.56-0.06
-0.13%
FlexShares ESG&Clmt Dev Mkts ex-US Cr
BUFF45.23-0.07
-0.17%
Innovator Laddered Allc Pwr Bfr ETF™
VSGX58.36-0.23
-0.39%
Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF
INDS36.79-0.15
-0.41%
Pacer Benchmark Industrial RE SCTR ETF
EMDV43.99-0.59
-1.33%
ProShares MSCI Emerg Mkts Div Growers

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
-3.50%
ENVA - OMF
69%
Closely correlated
-2.49%
COF - OMF
69%
Closely correlated
-2.12%
SYF - OMF
67%
Closely correlated
-1.98%
SLM - OMF
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
DFS - OMF
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
More